Fully remote is still available but noticeably harder than it was at peak, and it's hardest at exactly your point in the market. Many large employers have moved to hybrid mandates; genuinely remote-first companies remain, but competition for their roles is intense because they draw applicants globally.
**Why it's harder for juniors specifically:**
- Junior roles require more mentorship, review and informal learning, which is harder to deliver remotely. Companies know this and often prefer in-person for early-career hires.
- Remote roles attract very large applicant pools, so the bar rises. A remote junior posting might get ten times the applications of a local one.
- Trust is the underlying issue: employers extend remote flexibility more readily to people with a track record.
**What actually improves your odds:**
1. **Target remote-first companies**, not remote-tolerant ones. Companies built distributed from the start have the processes, documentation culture and management practice to make it work — and they hire remotely by default rather than as an exception. There are curated job boards specifically for these.
2. **Demonstrate remote-relevant skills explicitly**: clear written communication, self-direction, documentation. Your written application *is* the work sample for a remote role — a sloppy email is disqualifying in a way it isn't for an office job.
3. **Have evidence of working independently**: open-source contributions, freelance work, a project you completed alone. This addresses the trust gap directly.
4. **Be flexible on time zone overlap.** Willingness to overlap several hours with the team's core hours removes a common objection.
5. **Consider hybrid as a route.** Hybrid roles are far more plentiful, and a year of proven performance makes a remote conversation much easier — internally or at your next move.
**The strategy that works for many people**: take an in-person or hybrid role for the first year or two, build the fundamentals and the track record, then move remote with leverage. It's slower than you'd like and it's the higher-probability path.
**One honest trade-off to weigh**: remote work early in a career genuinely costs you something — the ambient learning, the relationships, the informal mentorship that accumulates from being in a room with more experienced people. That's a real cost, not employer propaganda, and it's worth factoring in alongside the obvious benefits rather than treating the question as purely about preference.